Delphi MethodResearch MethodsBest Practices

How to Recruit Experts for a Delphi Study: A Step-by-Step Guide

•4 min read

Expert recruitment is the stage where most Delphi studies encounter their first serious problems — not because researchers don't understand it's important, but because they underestimate how much time it takes and overestimate how many people will agree to participate. This guide covers how to define, find, contact, and secure the expert panel your study actually needs.

Step 1: Write Your Expert Definition First

Before searching for anyone, write down exactly what makes someone an expert for your specific research question. This definition should be concrete enough that you could apply it to a candidate's CV and reach a clear yes or no. Typical criteria combine:

  • Domain expertise — what field, specialty, or professional area qualifies
  • Experience threshold — minimum years of practice, seniority level, or position type
  • Engagement with the question — publication record, committee or working group membership, clinical or policy involvement in the relevant area
  • Exclusion criteria — conflicts of interest that would compromise anonymity or independence
  • Write this down before searching. Researchers who define expertise retroactively — after looking at who's available — end up with convenience panels that don't withstand scrutiny.

    Step 2: Build a Candidate List

    With your definition in hand, build a candidate list larger than your target panel size. Common sources:

  • Academic databases — search for authors who have published on your topic in the last 5–10 years. Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar all allow author-level searching
  • Professional associations — member directories, committee rosters, and conference speaker lists for the relevant field
  • Snowball sampling — ask initial contacts to nominate other experts who meet your criteria. This is common and methodologically accepted in Delphi research, but document it explicitly in your methods
  • Institutional directories — for education or health research, department directories at universities or hospitals can identify practitioners with the required background
  • Target a candidate list of at least twice your minimum panel size, and ideally three times. You will lose candidates at each stage: some won't respond, some will decline, some will drop out between rounds.

    Step 3: Write an Effective Invitation

    Your recruitment email needs to convey four things quickly: who you are, what the study is about, what participation involves (time commitment, number of rounds, estimated time per round), and why this particular person qualifies. Emails that don't explain the time commitment clearly get ignored or produce late dropouts.

    Keep the initial invitation short — three short paragraphs at most. Attach a one-page study information sheet with the full detail for those who want it. Include a clear and easy way to respond: a single reply confirming interest, not a form with multiple steps.

    Step 4: Follow Up Once

    Send one follow-up email 7–10 days after the initial invitation if you haven't received a response. A single follow-up is standard and expected; multiple follow-ups start to look like pressure and can damage the relationship before the study begins.

    Step 5: Confirm Participation Before Round 1

    Once a candidate agrees to participate, send a brief confirmation that includes: the anticipated Round 1 start date, the estimated number of rounds, the approximate time per round, and a contact address for questions. This confirmation reduces early dropout by setting expectations explicitly rather than leaving panelists to infer them.

    Managing Attrition

    Even with a well-recruited panel, expect 10–25% dropout between rounds. Strategies that reduce attrition:

  • Short rounds — keep each round to 20 minutes or less. Longer rounds produce more dropout regardless of panelist motivation
  • Prompt between-round feedback — panelists who wait too long between rounds lose engagement. Aim to distribute Round 2 within 2 weeks of Round 1 closing
  • Personalised reminders — brief, personal reminder emails work better than automated system messages
  • Acknowledge participation — a brief thank-you email at the end of each round, noting how many responses have come in, maintains engagement
  • What to Report in the Methods Chapter

    Your methods chapter should report: the number of candidates approached, the number who agreed, the number who completed each round, and the dropout rate between rounds. If you used snowball sampling, state this explicitly. Reviewers will look for this information — a methods section that only reports the final panel size without noting recruitment process and attrition is incomplete.

    Continue Learning in Delphi Academy

    Dive deeper into these topics with our comprehensive guides:

    Ready to Implement Your Delphi Study?

    Our platform streamlines every step of the Delphi process—from expert recruitment to automated statistical analysis and report generation.

    Related Articles

    Delphi MethodResearch Methods

    Delphi Consensus Protocol: When Is Consensus Reached?

    A Delphi consensus protocol fixes, before Round 1, exactly when a statement counts as agreed, when the study stops, and what happens to the items that never get there. Here is what goes into it and how to write it so that reviewers accept the consensus claim.

    6 min read•
    Delphi MethodResearch Methods

    How to Write a Delphi Study Protocol Before You Start

    The decisions that determine whether your Delphi study is defensible aren't made during data collection — they're made in the protocol, before you recruit a single panelist.

    4 min read•
    How to Recruit Experts for a Delphi Study: A Step-by-Step Guide | Durvey